Equitable Structured Capital Strategies (SCS) RILA Review (2026)
Written & reviewed by Hans Goldstein, Independent Licensed Insurance Producer · NPN 20602398Independently reviewed & last updated 2026-06-09
Quick take: Equitable (formerly AXA) created the first RILA — Structured Capital Strategies (SCS). The category leader in market share. Wide range of index options + buffer levels.
Ratings (independent third-party)
| Rating Agency | Grade |
|---|---|
| AM Best | A |
| S&P | A+ |
| Moody's | A2 |
| COMDEX (composite, 0-100) | 85 |
Hans is independently licensed. Reviews are based on publicly available rate sheets, prospectuses, AnnuityRateWatch listings, and carrier filings.
SCS — the original RILA
Equitable launched the first RILA in 2010 as Structured Capital Strategies. They've maintained category leadership since.
Spec variants
| Variant | Buffer | Index Options | Surrender |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCS Plus 6 | 10%, 20%, 30% | S&P 500, Russell 2000, MSCI EAFE | 6-year |
| SCS Income | 10%, 20% | S&P 500 + multiple | Income rider included |
| SCS Choice | 10%, 20% | Custom multi-index | 6-year |
Pros
- Category-leading product (most institutional history)
- Wide range of index + buffer combinations
- A/A+ rating from major mutual insurer
- Multiple investment sleeves
Cons
- Higher complexity than FIA
- Can lose money below buffer
- Less liquidity than VA (no daily NAV)
Best for
Risk-tolerant buyers who want equity exposure with capped downside and value the original RILA infrastructure.
Compare to
- Prudential FlexGuard — A+ rated alternative
- Brighthouse Shield — A rated alternative
- Athene Performance Elite — FIA alternative (0% floor)
About Hans Goldstein: Independent retirement income specialist. CA Life License #4163961. NPN #20602398. Reviews 30+ carriers. Phone: 213-414-2808. Email: hans@goldsteinco.net.
🧮 Goldstein Complexity Index
A core part of every Goldstein review. The more complex an annuity, the worse the rating in this dimension — because complexity is where buyers get burned (confusing riders, fee structures hidden in plain sight, surrender penalties that surprise people, separate "benefit bases" they thought were cash). Simple products (SPIAs, MYGAs) score low; products with stacked bonuses + income riders + MVA + multiple crediting strategies score high.
This product's score: 33/100 — Grade A (Mostly clear)
One or two complications (a rider, a crediting choice). With a 30-min agent walkthrough, most buyers understand it.
Score breakdown
| Dimension | Score (1–10) | What this measures |
|---|---|---|
| Riders | 4/10 | Number of optional/required riders (income, death benefit, LTC, etc.). More riders = more fees + more confusion. |
| Crediting strategies | 7/10 | Number of index-linked strategies (cap, spread, participation rate, step rate, volatility-controlled indices). More options = harder to understand. |
| Surrender complexity | 6/10 | Length of surrender period + MVA + bonus recapture interaction. Longer + MVA + recapture = more confusion. |
| Benefit-base separation | 2/10 | If the product has a separate "PIV" or income-base that is NOT cash but feels like cash. This is the single biggest source of buyer confusion in the industry. |
| Bonus structure | 1/10 | Premium bonus with recapture schedule. The bonus is real, but the recapture is complex. |
How to read this
- A+/A (0–40): You can understand what you bought. Pure accumulation FIA, MYGA, or SPIA. Low risk of mis-selling.
- B (41–60): You need to read the contract carefully and have a second-opinion review before signing. Income riders add the most confusion.
- C (61–80): Many buyers don't fully understand what they own. Common mis-selling: "bonus" sold as cash, "benefit base" sold as account value, surrender charges undisclosed.
- D (81–100): Demands an independent producer second opinion before signing. The product may still be right for you — but the chance you'll later say "I didn't know it worked that way" is very high.
Why complexity matters more than people think: Carriers don't get sued for complexity. Agents don't get sued for it either (in most states). But buyers regret it constantly. The annuity that wins your money in year one and confuses you for the next 14 is worse than a simpler product that you understood perfectly. Simple ≠ inferior. Simple = audit-able.
⏳ Renewal rate risk — why FIA caps work like HYSA rates (NOT mortgage rates)
This is the #1 thing buyers misunderstand about fixed indexed annuities, and the single biggest source of "I didn't know it worked that way" regret after year 3.
The mortgage-rate mental model is wrong
When you take out a 30-year fixed mortgage at 6.5%, that rate is locked for the entire term. The bank can't raise it. That's how most buyers assume an FIA cap rate works.
It's not. FIA cap rates work like high-yield savings account rates.
When Marcus or Ally raises their HYSA rate from 4.0% to 4.5%, that's their choice — and they can drop it back to 4.0% the next month. The rate you saw when you opened the account is NOT the rate you keep forever. The bank can change it at any time.
FIA cap rates work the same way:
- The cap you see at purchase applies to the first crediting period only (typically year 1).
- At each anniversary, the carrier can reset the cap within the contractual minimum.
- If interest rates fall or the carrier's option budget tightens, your cap can drop dramatically — sometimes from 9% down to 3-4% over a few years.
Why caps change: the option-budget mechanics
Carriers don't print money to pay your index-linked credit. They take your premium, invest most of it in bonds at prevailing interest rates, and use the bond yield to buy S&P 500 call options that generate the index credit.
- Rates UP → bond yields rise → more option budget → higher caps possible
- Rates DOWN → bond yields fall → less option budget → caps get cut
The 2010-2021 low-rate environment crushed FIA caps across the entire industry. The 2022-2025 rate cycle restored them. Whatever cap you see today is a function of TODAY's interest rate environment — and that environment will change.
The minimum cap floor (the only real guarantee)
Every FIA contract has a minimum guaranteed cap stated in the contract. This is the LOWEST the cap can ever go. Common minimum caps:
- Some contracts: 1% minimum cap (essentially nothing)
- Better contracts: 2-3% minimum cap
- Top-tier products: 4%+ minimum cap
Read the minimum cap before signing. If it's 1%, your worst-case scenario is essentially 0% real returns for 10+ years.
How to evaluate a carrier's renewal practices BEFORE buying
The single best protection: ask the agent for the carrier's in-force renewal-rate history for the product you're being quoted. A carrier that's maintained competitive caps on existing contracts over 5+ years is much more trustworthy than one with no history (or worse, a history of cap cuts).
Carriers with the most consistent in-force renewal track records (industry consensus as of 2026): Athene, Allianz, Sammons (North American/Midland), American Equity, and Nationwide. These carriers have published renewal-rate histories that survive scrutiny.
Carriers without published renewal-rate histories OR with a history of cutting caps post-sale should be evaluated carefully — especially if the cap they're showing you today is near the top of the market.
The single most important questions to ask
- "What's the minimum guaranteed cap in this contract?"
- "Can you show me this product's in-force renewal-rate history for the last 5 years?"
- "What's the current cap on in-force contracts purchased in 2020, 2018, and 2015?"
- "If the cap drops to the minimum, what's my realistic annual credited return?"
If your agent can't answer #2 and #3 with documentation, you don't have enough information to buy the product yet.
Explain it like I'm 12 — how an FIA with income rider works
An FIA with a GLWB (Guaranteed Lifetime Withdrawal Benefit) income rider is a complex product that tracks TWO separate values:
- Account Value — what you'd get back if you surrender (subject to surrender charges)
- Benefit Base (a.k.a. PIV, Income Pool) — a separate accounting number used ONLY to calculate your guaranteed income for life. NOT cash.
The benefit base grows by a "rollup rate" (typically 6-8%) during the deferral period. At activation, the benefit base × payout percentage = your guaranteed annual income for life.
The math:
- $200,000 premium into an FIA with 7% rollup income rider, defer 10 years, activate at 70
- Year 10 benefit base: ~$393,000 (with 7% rollup)
- Payout factor at 70: ~6% = $23,580 annual income for life
Critical: the $393,000 benefit base is NOT cash. You can't take it out. If you surrender, you get the account value (which is usually much lower, in the $250-280K range after credits).
The fees:
- Income rider fee: 0.85-1.50% per year, charged on the benefit base
- Surrender charges 7-15 years
- 10% free withdrawal per year
- Cap rates on the account value (limited by option budget shared with the rider)
Quick FIA + GLWB FAQ
Q: What's the difference between benefit base and account value?
A: Benefit base = accounting value used to calculate income rider payouts. NOT cash. Account value = what you'd get on surrender. Two separate values — the #1 confusion in the entire FIA market.
Q: What if I never activate the income rider?
A: You paid the rider fee (~1% × years held) for nothing. If you might not activate, choose an FIA without income rider — same product, no rider fee, higher caps.
Q: Once I activate, can I stop?
A: No. Income activation is irrevocable. Choose carefully.
Q: How does joint life work?
A: Both spouses' lives covered; income continues to surviving spouse. Costs ~15-25% lower monthly than single life.
Q: What's the rollup rate vs. payout factor?
A: Rollup = how the benefit base GROWS during deferral. Payout factor = % of benefit base credited as annual income at activation. Both matter; you need to model the math at YOUR activation age.
Q: How do I compare different income riders?
A: See our Best GLWB Income Riders Comparison.
Q: When does FIA + GLWB beat SPIA?
A: When you defer 7-10+ years AND actually activate. For shorter deferrals or buyers who might not activate, SPIA is usually better. See Why GLWB FIA Are Over-Pushed.
Q: Are income rider gains taxable?
A: Yes — ordinary income tax on payouts (non-qualified: partial exclusion via §72 for some structures; qualified: fully taxable).
📩 Get a second opinion before you sign — this is a big decision
Talk to a licensed independent expert. Hans.
RILAs can lose money. Before you sign, fully understand the buffer mechanics, and make sure your agent isn't mis-selling 'principal protection' that doesn't exist. Get an independent review of the buffer structure + downside math.
Drop your info — within 24 hours, you'll get a written independent review of your quote, side-by-side comparisons vs. 2 alternatives, and a no-pressure 15-minute call if you want one.
📞 Hans Goldstein · 213-414-2808 · NPN 20602398, independent licensed insurance producer appointed with multiple A-rated carriers
By submitting, you agree to receive calls and texts from Hans Goldstein. Msg/data rates apply. Reply STOP to opt out. Privacy Policy.
Disclosure
This review reflects publicly available product materials and approximate rates as of the date stated above. Annuity rates, caps, participation rates, payout factors, crediting methods, and long-term care benefit structures change frequently — typically monthly. Always confirm current values against the most recent carrier disclosure document and the actual contract before purchasing. This article is general information for educational purposes; it is not a personalized recommendation, solicitation, or offer of any specific product. Hans Goldstein is an independent licensed insurance producer (NPN 20602398) appointed with multiple A-rated carriers across the annuity and long-term care insurance market; the producer's specific appointment status with the carrier discussed in this review may vary, and this review is not an endorsement or representation of carrier appointment. No compensation has been received from any carrier in connection with the publication of this review. Always read the actual contract and consult a licensed advisor before purchasing any annuity or long-term care insurance product. Past index performance does not predict future credited interest. Annuities and hybrid life+LTC policies are long-term contracts with surrender charges; they are not suitable for funds you may need before the end of the surrender period. AM Best ratings and tax treatment are subject to change. Tax discussion of IRC §7702B, §1035, and the Pension Protection Act of 2006 reflects law as of 2026 and is subject to change.