Goldstein Take · Hans's editorial verdict · reviewed Oct 3, 2026 · how we grade →
| Option | Verdict | One-line take |
|---|---|---|
| SPIA or MYGA income floor | A- | Contractual income or a locked rate covers the bills, so stocks are never sold low to pay them. |
| Cash bucket (1 to 3 years of spending) | B+ | Simple and liquid; it buys time but earns little and runs out in a long downturn. |
| Bond tent (more bonds near retirement) | B | Lowers the damage of an early crash; 2022 showed bonds can fall with stocks. |
| Permanent life cash value as a buffer | B- | Can be drawn in a down year instead of selling stocks, if the policy is well funded and stays in force. |
| 100% stocks, fixed withdrawals | D | Works on average returns, fails on bad timing; the order of returns decides the outcome. |
Bottom line: The danger is not a bad year. It is a bad year early, while you are withdrawing. Build a floor that pays the bills regardless of the market, then let the rest stay invested.
Educational, not tax advice. Grades answer only the question in the title, for a typical case; your facts can change the answer.
Use annuities for what they're great at, income and protection, not as a tax-efficient growth account. See current MYGA rates, SPIA rates, or get a free annuity review.
The takeaway: use annuities for what they are great at, income and protection, not as a tax-efficient growth account. Compare MYGA rates and SPIA rates, or get a free annuity review.
AI voices. Education, not tax or legal advice. Hans is paid a commission if you buy a policy through him. Comment REVIEW on the video for the checklist.
While you are saving, the order of returns barely matters: a crash early and a boom late lands you in about the same place as the reverse. Once you start withdrawing, order matters a great deal. Money you sell in a down year is gone; it cannot ride the recovery. This page is educational, not tax or investment advice.
Hypothetical: same five returns, opposite order, $1,000,000 start, $50,000 withdrawn at the start of each year
| Year | Return (Retiree A) | Balance A, end of year | Return (Retiree B) | Balance B, end of year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -20% | $760,000 | +25% | $1,187,500 |
| 2 | -10% | $639,000 | +15% | $1,308,125 |
| 3 | +5% | $618,450 | +5% | $1,321,031 |
| 4 | +15% | $653,718 | -10% | $1,143,928 |
| 5 | +25% | $754,647 | -20% | $875,142 |
Hypothetical arithmetic, not a forecast and not based on any index. Both retirees average 3% a year over the five years and withdraw the same $250,000. Retiree A, who took the losses first, ends about $120,500 behind. Calculation: balance = (prior balance minus $50,000) x (1 + return).
Nothing about Retiree A's investments was worse. The losses simply came while the balance was largest and withdrawals were already running.
Send your email and I'll send a plain-English plan for an income floor that pays the bills no matter what the market does, within one business day.
We’ll email it to you. Hans Goldstein · NPN 20602398.
Rather talk it through? Or book 15 minutes on Hans’s calendar.
In 2008 the S&P 500 returned about negative 37% including dividends (negative 36.55% in Damodaran's series, Damodaran, NYU Stern: historical S&P 500 returns (updated 1/5/2026)), and it fell about 57% from its 2007 peak to the March 2009 low. People who retired just before it and kept withdrawing a fixed amount were selling shares near the bottom. Many who were 60 then could not have rebuilt the balance by working longer, and a retiree in their 70s today has even less time to wait for a recovery. That is why many retirees cannot afford another 2008 on the money they need for the next ten years of bills.
The classic answer to stock risk is bonds. 2022 tested it: the S&P 500 returned about negative 18% (negative 18.04%, Damodaran, NYU Stern: historical S&P 500 returns (updated 1/5/2026)) and the broad US bond market lost about 13% (the iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF returned negative 13.01%, iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG), 2022 calendar-year return) as interest rates rose quickly. A balanced portfolio had nowhere to hide. Bonds still have a role, but the year showed that a 60/40 mix is not the same thing as an income guarantee.
Required minimum distributions for 2023 were calculated from account balances on December 31, 2022, after that down year. For a 75-year-old, the Uniform Lifetime Table divisor is 24.6 (26 CFR 1.401(a)(9)-9 (Uniform Lifetime Table)). An IRA that was $1,000,000 a year earlier but $840,000 on 12/31/2022 produced an RMD of about $34,146 instead of $40,650 (hypothetical balances). RMDs start at age 73 today, rising to 75 from 2033 (26 U.S.C. 401(a)(9) (RMD age 73, rising to 75 from 2033)). A smaller RMD sounds like good news for taxes, but it is really a mirror of the problem: the account had shrunk, and anyone withdrawing more than the minimum to cover living costs was taking a larger share of a smaller balance. That is sequence risk showing up on a tax form.
The 4% rule and annuity replacement page shows how a floor changes how much you can safely withdraw from the rest.
An income floor gives up some upside and liquidity on the money used to build it, and fixed annuity income can lose buying power to inflation. The trade is certainty on the bills in exchange for less growth on that slice.
Send your essential monthly bills and current guaranteed income. Within one business day you get SPIA and MYGA options that cover the gap, side by side.
Educational, not investment or tax advice.
Rather talk it through? Or book 15 minutes on Hans’s calendar, or call 213-414-2808.
Hans Goldstein · 213-414-2808 · NPN 20602398, independent licensed insurance producer
Hans Goldstein, CA Insurance License #4273294 · NPN 20602398 · Goldstein & Co. LLC dba Goldstein Insurance Services, CA License #6016830
Contact: hans@hansgoldstein.com · 213-414-2808
General education, not tax or legal advice. Tax treatment depends on your facts and on current law, which can change. Talk to your CPA or estate attorney. Guarantees are backed by the financial strength and claims-paying ability of the issuing insurance company. Guarantees apply only to the contractual terms of the policy. Caps, participation rates, loan rates, charges and dividends are not guaranteed and can change. Hans is paid a commission by the insurer if you buy a policy through him. For life insurance, ask and he will tell you what he earns on your specific policy. Product and company names are trademarks of their owners. Goldstein Insurance Services is an independent agency, not affiliated with or endorsed by any insurer named here. Commission ranges cited are from the public sources listed and vary by insurer, product, term, issue age and state. Annuities have surrender charges and other limitations; read the contract and disclosure before you buy.